Kramer v. Board of Police Commissioners
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Jas. M. Troutt, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George Lull, City Attorney, and Milton Marks, Assistant City Attorney, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment directing the issuance of a writ of mandate requiring the defendants to reinstate the plaintiff and respondent herein as a police officer. The judgment followed an order overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended petition for such writ, the defendants declining to answer.
The facts, as presented in the plaintiff’s petition, are as follows: Prior to the month of August, 1906, the plaintiff was a regularly appointed and acting police officer of the city and county of San Francisco, but in that month, owing to conditions created by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Donovan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Harby v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- State ex rel. Young v. LadeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
3Cited by17 opinions
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Hayman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Moreno v. CairnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Fox v. Piercey, Chief of the Fire DepartmentUtah Supreme Court · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.