Legal Opinion

Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Katz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 12, 1992No. 89C-12081; CA A66307Published

1Opinion of the Court

841 P.2d 652 (1992)

116 Or. App. 302

PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, dba U.S. West Communications, Respondent,

v.

Myron B. KATZ, Ron Eachus, Nancy Ryles and Oregon Public Utility Commission, Appellants, and

Citizen's Utility Board, Intervenor-Appellant.

89C-12081; CA A66307.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted January 3, 1992.

Resubmitted October 14, 1992.

Decided November 12, 1992.

Keith L. Kutler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sunshine Dairy v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. SabinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. BeanOregon Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API