Legal Opinion
State v. Hicks
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 3, 2013No. A12-1107PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHUTICH, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction of second-degree unintentional felony murder, appellant Mo Savoy Hicks argues that the district court: (1) violated the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct and deprived him of his right to an impartial fact-finder; (2) erred by excluding the public from his trial; and (3) erred by imposing an upward durational departure based solely on concealment of the victim’s body. Hicks makes two pro se arguments as well.
Because the district court did not violate the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct in making a factual determination or violate Hicks’s…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. SilvernailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Smith v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- State of Minnesota v. Corey Lee MeldeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Jeffery Dale TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.