State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, II
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentPage, Justice
I respectfully dissent from that part of the court’s decision upholding1- the trial court’s requirement that members of the public provide photo identification in order to attend Taylor’s trial. In State v. Brown, we authorized trial courts to lock courtroom doors during the time when the jury is being instructed. 815 N.W.2d 609, 617-18 (Minn.2012). We extended our approval of locking the courtroom doors to closing arguments in State v. Silvernail, 881 N.W.2d 594, 600-01 (Minn.2013). Today we take another step in our march to limit the public’s access to our courtrooms. While I fully…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. SilvernailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. BoboSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.