Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Luckey v. Etheridge
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1992No. 90-1203PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The determinative issue before us is whether relator received proper notice from the board of education of its decision not to reemploy her in her position as an assistant superintendent. For the reasons that follow, we hold that relator did not receive proper notice pursuant to R.C. 3319.02.
R.C. 3319.02(C) provides in pertinent part:
“An assistant superintendent, principal, assistant principal, or other administrator is, at the expiration of his current term of employment, deemed reemployed at the same salary plus any increments that may be authorized by the board of education, unless he…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Brennan v. Vinton County Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Lee v. Bellefontaine City Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by14 opinions
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School District BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Naylor v. Cardinal Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Smith v. EtheridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.