State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Brooks
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
NESBITT, Judge.
Dwonvalyn Johnson was a passenger in his grandfather James Brooks’ auto when it was rear-ended by a stolen vehicle. Prior to trial, summary judgment on the issues of liability, UM coverage, and tort threshold, were granted in Johnson and Brooks’ favor. After a two-day trial, a jury returned a verdict finding that Brooks had sustained $500 in damages but that Johnson had sustained no damages. Both plaintiffs moved for an additur or new trial. The trial judge denied the motion as to Brooks, however, granted a new trial as to Johnson. Nowhere did the trial judge state the grounds…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Groover v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Easkold v. RhodesSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Prime Motor Inns, Inc. v. WaltmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Oakes v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dream Inn, Inc. v. HesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- PINES LEARNING CENTRE, INC. v. ShipmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Casines v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011