Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Brooks

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 31, 1995No. 93-2074PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBITT, Judge.

Dwonvalyn Johnson was a passenger in his grandfather James Brooks’ auto when it was rear-ended by a stolen vehicle. Prior to trial, summary judgment on the issues of liability, UM coverage, and tort threshold, were granted in Johnson and Brooks’ favor. After a two-day trial, a jury returned a verdict finding that Brooks had sustained $500 in damages but that Johnson had sustained no damages. Both plaintiffs moved for an additur or new trial. The trial judge denied the motion as to Brooks, however, granted a new trial as to Johnson. Nowhere did the trial judge state the grounds…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Groover v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Easkold v. RhodesSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Prime Motor Inns, Inc. v. WaltmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. Oakes v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dream Inn, Inc. v. HesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. PINES LEARNING CENTRE, INC. v. ShipmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Casines v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API