Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Ziegler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1925No. 7314. [fn*]PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmxtpi, J.

Most of appellees’ brief is taken up with objections to the consideration of’ the record on appeal, but these objections are deemed without sufficient merit to require discussion, except in one particular. It is recited in the caption of the transcript that the term of the court at which this cause was tried convened on April 7, 1924, and adjourned on May 31. The transcript itself shows appellant’s motion for new trial was not presented or acted upon until June 27th, nearly a month subsequent to the recited date of adjournment. Of course a motion for new trial must be disposed of during the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Gilbert v. . FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Donaldson v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bradshaw v. Baylor UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McMillen v. KlingensmithTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Cypress Creek Utility Service Co. v. MullerTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Knutson v. Morton Foods, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API