Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Vanden Dorpel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 18, 1995No. 1—92—1401, 1—92—2751 consPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cerda

Plaintiff, Elisabeth Anderson, brought this action seeking damages from defendants, Ronald Vanden Dorpel and Northwestern University, for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and defamation. The trial court granted defendants’ section 2—615 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 110, par. 2—615 (now 735 ILCS 5/2—615 (West 1992))) motion to dismiss count I, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and issued a Supreme Court Rule 304(a) finding of no just reason to delay enforcement or appeal. (134 Ill. 2d R. 304(a).) Subsequently, the trial court granted…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Chapski v. Copley PressIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. John v. Tribune CompanyIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Mittelman v. WitousIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Vanden DorpelIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Barry Harlem Corp. v. KraffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Quinn v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Zdeb v. Baxter International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Anderson v. Vanden DorpelIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API