Legal Opinion
Patecell v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 18, 1989No. 434-85CPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
In this patent action, plaintiffs, Theodore C. Patecell (Patecell) and The Patecell Corporation, seek compensation under 28 U.S. C. § 1498 for the alleged unauthorized use by the United States of a flat tire safety insert allegedly covered by the claims of two patents owned by plaintiffs, United States Patent No. 4,270,592 (the ’592 patent), and United States Reissue Patent No. Re 28,196 (the reissue patent). This action is presently before the court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, which involves only claim 29 of the reissue patent.
Defendant contends…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.