Legal Opinion
Clark v. Muzio
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided September 18, 1986No. File 310257PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
The plaintiff has taken this appeal from the suspension of his operator’s license by the defendant commissioner after an administrative finding that he had refused to submit to a chemical test required by § 14-227b of the General Statutes. His principal claim is that his request to contact his attorney after his arrest for operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor, a violation of § 14-227a, did not constitute a refusal to submit to the testing required by § 14-227b. He also raises two other issues on this appeal, first, that there was insufficient evidence to support the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- O'Rourke v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Schallenkamp v. DelponteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Kirei v. HadleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Burnett v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.