Legal Opinion
Gosnell v. Lloyd
California Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 11554PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment in an action to rescind a contract or for declaratory relief, wherein the right to rescind was denied and the rights of the parties declared.
The plaintiffs are the son and daughter of T. B. Gosnell and sue in their capacity as the legally appointed guardians of his estate. On June 17, 1925, T. B. Gosnell was the co-owner with his son and daughter of a one-eighth share of the royalties payable under an oil lease executed in October, 1913,- by Caroline Gosnell and T. B. Gosnell, her husband, and the latter’s son and daughter as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Allore v. JewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bacon v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Hayward Union High School District v. MadridCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.