Legal Opinion
Avitts v. Amoco Production Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 4, 1994No. G-90-317 Thru G-90-326, G-90-338, G-90-339, G-90-390 Thru G-90-392 and G-91-52PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ATTORNEY’S FEES
KENT, District Judge.
This cause came to trial on November 8, 1993, on the Plaintiffs’ claims for nuisance, trespass, negligence, and breach of contract. Essentially, the Plaintiffs sought relief for the surface and subsurface contamination of their property brought on by the oil exploration operations of the Defendants. After four days of testimony, including that of James Triekett, head of the environmental section for Defendant Amoco Production Company, it became apparent that final and just relief in this matter…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Avitts v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Rice v. Harken Exploration Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
- Hinton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
- Power Authority of New York v. Tug M/V ELLEN S. BOUCHARDDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Avitts v. Amoco ProductionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.