Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 7, 1997No. Civil Action No. H-96-2070PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion on Attorney’s Lien

HUGHES, District Judge.

1. Introduction.

After having lost the ease on the merits, Hinton’s counsel filed an attorney’s hen with the Federal National Mortgage Association, claiming an interest in refunds that may result from a possible change in pohcy. The hen is void because FNMA’s change of poh-cy, if it comes, is the result of something other than this lawsuit. Having done nothing illegal, FNMA’s new pohcy could not be a voluntary compliance in response to the threat of losing the htigation. If FNMA wins and still decides to adopt the economic or pohtical posture…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knebel v. Capital National Bank in AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hamer v. KirkIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Finkelstein v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Thomson v. Findlater Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Avitts v. Amoco Production Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hinton v. Fed Natl Mtge AssnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API