Legal Opinion

Vanderbilt v. . the Travelers Insurance Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cabdozo, Pound and McLaughlin, JJ. Dissenting: Crane and Andrews, JJ., on ground that the word “war” in the exception of the policy because of its association, means war in which the insured participates as a belligerent.

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stankus v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Hooker v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
  4. Eggena v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. Hooker v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API