Legal Opinion
Chandler v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 15, 1940No. 13476PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. A brief of evidence is essential to the validity of any motion for a new trial; and this is true even though the only ground of the motion insisted upon does not require a consideration of any of the evidence introduced on the trial. Dollar v. Fred W. Amend Co., 186 Ga. 717 (198 S. E. 753), and cit., overruling the decision to the contrary in Audulph v. Josey, 44 Ga. 605.
2. Where a motion for new trial has been set down for a hearing, with the right of the movant to have “until the final hearing, whenever it may be had, to present for approval a brief of the evidence,” the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Henderson v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Dollar v. Fred W. Amend Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Napier v. HeilkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Broadway National Bank v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Shockley v. TurnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McWane Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Cox v. Bank of OchlochneeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Parrott v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965