Legal Opinion

Ballard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1971No. 43375PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is fondling; the punishment, fifteen (15) years.

We are met at the outset with appellant’s objection to the charge because it failed to limit the jury’s consideration of appellant’s written statement for the purpose of impeachment and to infer or show intent.

While testifying on cross-examination, the appellant stated that he had not had intercourse with Kathy, the prosecutrix, who was his ten year old stepdaughter. He also stated that he “didn’t mess around with little children” and that he did not fondle Kathy or Joyce or any of the rest of his stepchildren.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Gephart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Lacy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Lanham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McKinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Mendiola v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  3. Townsend v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  4. Boutwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Boutwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API