Louis Eckels & Sons Ice Manufacturing Co. v. Cornell Economizer Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Ambler, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.
This is the defendants appeal from a judgment obtained by the appellee in the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The defendant is a corporation under the laws of Maryland, owning and operating a plant in the City of Baltimore for the manufacture of ice, and the plaintiff is a corporation of the City of Philadelphia, and the owner of a patented device called “Cornell Patent Economizer and Smoke Consumer.”
The declaration contains the common money counts, and two special counts; one upon a promissory note dated March 17th, 1910, for $820 made by the defendant, and payable to the order of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Morrison v. WhitesideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
- Ingersoll v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- McSherry v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
- Perry v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Nolan v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Continental Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- J. A. Laporte Corp. v. Pennsylvania-Dixie Cement Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Allison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.