Legal Opinion

Holman v. Durham Buggy Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1917No. 4 Div. 740PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dale County; J. S. Williams, Judge. k Action by the Durham Buggy Company against J. D. Holman. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The action is on two promissory notes,. given hy defendant to plaintiff in settlement of balances due on account for buggies sold by plaintiff, a North Carolina corporation, to defendant, a resident of Alabama. The sales were clearly acts of interstate commerce, which defendant concedes, but he denies liability on the notes on the theory that their subsequent execution and acceptance in settlement of balances was no part of the original transaction, and not interstate commerce, especially in view of the provision, for attorney’s fees incorporated in the notes, and securing an advantage to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farrior v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Beard v. Union & American Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Sullivan v. Sullivan Timber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. International Cotton Seed Oil Co. v. WheelockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Dudley v. Collier & PinckardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Hall Auto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Friedlander Bros. v. DealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Boyette v. Preston Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Associates Capital Services Corp. v. Loftin's Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Ex Parte TranSouth Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API