Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Hall Auto Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 30, 1933No. 6 Div. 227, 228PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS,. Justice.
It was agreed that one record on appeal would cover the entire proceedings in botli cases, and that it would not be necessary to certify separate records. The cases therefore will be so considered in this court upon the “separate and several assignments of error, separately and severally,” etc.
The separate and several respective grounds of demurrer directed to count 6 of the complaint as amended by appellees Hall Auto Company and Reid Motor Company ■were overruled. This action is assigned as respective error by the Ford Motor Company.
That count (count 6) claimed damages under…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bank of America v. Whitney Central National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Bolton v. White Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Boyd v. Warren Paint & Color Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Trailway Oil Company v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- City Stores Company v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.