Legal Opinion

Savage v. Tweedy

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 10, 2012No. 3:12-cv-1317-HZPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Now before me is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”) (doc. #2)1 filed by Peter Savage (“Savage”), Cliff Puckett (“Puckett”), Gabe Triplett (“Triplett”), and V. Michael Wallace (“Wallace”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs’ Motion seeks an order that Defendants: (1) “be preliminarily enjoined from implementing any aspect of the penalties imposed against [PJlaintiffs July 13, 2012, [sic]”; (2) “be preliminarily enjoined to reinstate [PJlaintiffs to any offices from which they have been removed pursuant to said penalties”; (3)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Sammartano v. First Judicial District Court, in and for the County of Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Magríz-Marrero v. Unión de Tronquistas de Puerto Rico, Local 901District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API