Legal Opinion

Rheinberger v. Security Life Ins. Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 13, 1934No. 5165PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court denying appellants’ petition for leave to intervene in a receivership proceeding of the Security life Insurance Company of America instituted by stockholder Eheinberger. The facts are set forth in the opinion of the District Court in 4 F. Supp. 824, and are made a part of this opinion by reference.

The basis of the intervening petition was an order of the District Court on November 12, 1932, approving amendments to a reinsurance contract entered into by Central Life Insurance Company of Illinois and the receiver of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. First Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. FlershemSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Swift v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  2. State v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. Baltimore Trust Co. v. Interocean Oil Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API