Legal Opinion
State v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 18, 1936No. Nos. 8014, 8028, 8055PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
Columbia River Packers Association, Baker’s Bay Fish Company, and H. J. Barbey, hereinafter referred to as appellants, have appealed from a decree adjudicating that the United States, hereinafter referred to as appellee, is the owner and entitled to the immediate and exclusive possession of the sands and tide flats in question and enjoining appellants from occupying or attempting to occupy the property in question. After the suit was commenced by appellee against appellants, the State of Washington filed a motion asking leave to intervene, which motion was granted by…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Boris v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Charles Keeshin, Inc. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of RogersDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961
- B. J. Stumpf v. Fidelity Gas Co., a Corporation, Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., a Corporation and Shell Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.