Legal Opinion
Baltimore Trust Co. v. Interocean Oil Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 14, 1939No. 2055PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The present question to be decided is whether Joseph S. Hoffman, alleged holder of a one thousand dollar bond of the Inter-ocean Oil Company, should be permitted to intervene in the case for the purpose of taking an appeal from the order and decree of this court dated September 25, 1939, which refused confirmation of public sale of property of the Interocean Oil Company to the American Trading and Production Corporation for $100,000, and confirmed a sale to the Richfield Oil Corporation for $230,000.
The petition for intervention was filed November 2, 1939. Answers to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Palmer v. Bankers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- United States v. Northern Securities Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1904
- Caldwell v. Guardian Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Stallings v. ConnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Defense Plant Corporation v. United States Barge LinesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Lockwood v. Hercules Powder Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1947
- Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1942
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- In Re Chain Yacht v. St. Louis BoatingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949