Legal Opinion

Scott v. Marchant

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9739PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From tbe Whitley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

— This was an action by the appellant Phoebe Scott upon an appeal bond executed by the appellees Charles *350E. Marchant and Ambrose M. Trumbull. A demurrer to the complaint for want of sufficient facts was sustained. This ruling alone is assigned as error.

It was alleged in the complaint, that the appellant commenced a suit in the Whitley Circuit Court on the '7th of November, 1876, making defendants thereto the appellee Mar-chant, John H. Truman, Jeremiah Zartman and others, in which suit appellant demanded by her complaint a personal judgment against said Truman, and the cancellation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Hinkle v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Willson v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. GranthamIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Garrett v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Adoue v. WettermarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Cook v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. R. Kinsey Brooks, Susan K. Brooks v. Bank of GenevaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API