Legal Opinion
Hinkle v. Holmes
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1882No. 9882PublishedCited by 8 opinions
From the Jackson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.
The complaint in this case was by David F. Hinkle against John W. Holmes and Edward C. Emery, and ■stated that, on the 4th day of May, 1876, the plaintiff had, in a certain action in which he was plaintiff, and James Ramey, Daniel E. Ramey and the said JohnW. Holmes were defendants, recovered a judgment against the said James Ramey and Daniel E. Ramey, for the sum of $631.76, and a foreclosure of a chattel mortgage against all of the defendants, to satisfy said judgment, and for costs in said action, taxed at $229.93; that, on the 23d day of May, 1876, the plaintiff caused an execution and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Railsback v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Jones v. DronebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Ham v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Buchanan v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Willson v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barr, Trustee v. Geary, AuditorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
- Supreme Council of the Catholic Benevolent Legion v. BoyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Thompson v. RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Rockey v. HershmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
- Majenica Telephone Co. v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.