Legal Opinion
Federal Insurance v. Homestore, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 12, 2005No. Nos. 03-55995, 03-55996, 03-55997, 03-55998, 03-56351, 03-56365, 03-56445, 3-56468, 03-56472, 03-56488, 03-56508, 03-56509, 03-56641, 03-56644PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
In this consolidated diversity appeal, Defendants-Appellants (“Insureds”) Homestore, Inc. (“Homestore”), together with current and former Homestore directors and officers, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Insurers”) Genesis Insurance Company (“Genesis”), Royal Indemnity Company (“Royal”), Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) and Clarendon Insurance Company (“Clarendon”). Appellants contend that the district judge erred in granting summary judgment to the Insurers and declaring the Insurers’ directors’ and officers’ (“D &…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Thompson v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Jeffrey G. Harden v. Roadway Package Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tapestry on Central Condominium Association v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021