Legal Opinion
James Harris v. Lee Rand
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 13, 2012No. 10-57012PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:
James B. Harris et al. (collectively, “plaintiffs”) appeal from the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of their first amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court, citing Hertz Corp. v. Friend, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1181, 175 L.Ed.2d 1029 (2010), dismissed the first amended complaint because plaintiffs failed to provide factual support for their allegations of diversity. But Hertz did not impose a heightened pleading standard and, in two orders issued before its order of dismissal, the district court requested that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Nadia Naffe v. John FreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. WynnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Adam Brooks v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Desert Water Agency v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.