Legal Opinion
Beals v. Hirsch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
The plaintiff, during all the times mentioned in the complaint, was engaged at East Greenwich, R. I., in the manufacture of woolen cloth, under the trade name of Greenwich Mills. Prior to October 8, 1920, the plaintiff had manufactured for and delivered to the defendant a woolen cloth designated as “ Style 117/1.” This cloth had been found by the defendant to be of fighter weight than he required in his business, and on October 8, 1920, the plaintiff and the defendant at the city of New York, where the defendant was engaged in business and the plaintiff had a sales office, entered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bogardus v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Henry Glass & Co. v. MisrochNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Croninger v. . CrockerNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Hoffman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Friedman v. BachmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Crosland v. SloanOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Kaplan v. KraussAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
- Atlantic & Pacific Packing Co. v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
- Kouloris v. CohenNew York City Court · 1928