Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Krauss

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 5, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

These two actions are by sellers against buyers to recover damages for non-acceptance.

By the order dated August 20, 1931, which is the subject of action No. 1, plaintiffs agreed to ship to defendants in December, 1931, and January and February, 1932, 2,000 dozen of split pandans at specified prices, “ terms, nett. 60 trade accep. on delivery.” Under the contract dated January 9, 1932, upon which is based action No. 2, plaintiffs agreed to deliver 2,000 dozen of Toyo panamas at certain prices, “ shipment from Kobe February complete; terms, nett. 60 days trade acceptance.”

Four cases of pandans…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henry Glass & Co. v. MisrochNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Brown v. Raritan Chemical Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Beals v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Beals v. HirschNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Plumb v. J. W. Hallauer & Sons Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knower v. AtkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API