Legal Opinion

Kouloris v. Cohen

New York City Court

Decided February 9, 1928Published

1Opinion of the CourtHarawitz, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover the portion of the purchase price which he has already paid, and claims to have effected a rescission because of the failure to deliver the goods within the time specified in the contract.

The plaintiff operates a type of lunch room which is generally known as a coffee pot and entered into a contract with the defendant to buy fixtures for this coffee pot. The contract provided that these fixtures were to be delivered by July 16, 1927. A portion of these fixtures was delivered and the sum of $260 was paid. The balance of the fixtures, however, was not delivered.

It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Sorenson v. Keesey Hosiery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Croninger v. . CrockerNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Beals v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. Lipps v. LangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API