Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1981No. TC Nos. C 79-05-31465, C 79-05-31466, C 79-05-31467, C 79-05-31468, C 79-05-31469 and C 79-05-31470 CA No. 16512 SC No. 27590PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

Defendant was convicted of five counts of forgery in the first degree (ORS 165.013) and one count of theft in the first degree (ORS 164.055). She contends that her actions did not constitute forgery under ORS 165.013. She further contends that all of her convictions should be combined into one conviction under ORS 131.505(4).

Defendant was employed at John Snyder Tool Co., Inc., as an assistant bookkeeper. The normal procedure for handling the deposit of checks was as follows: when checks were received in payment of accounts receivable at her employer’s office, she stamped the checks with a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Windle, Adm'x v. FlinnOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. People v. HoffmanNew York Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edward D. Jones & Co. v. MishlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API