Legal Opinion
Schmitz v. Dinicola
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided October 23, 1969No. File 106678PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFitzGerald, J.
The initial action was returned to court on the first Tuesday of March, 1965. It is one in which John E. Schmitz is party plaintiff and Anthony DiNieola, doing business as DiNieola’s Park and Crown Eestaurant in New Haven, Connecticut, is party defendant. The officer’s return on file discloses that on February 11,1965, by virtue of the writ, he attached three pieces of real estate in New Haven in which the defendant had an interest, and on February 13, 1965, he made personal service upon the defendant.
In substance the complaint in the initial action alleges that on and prior to April 7,1964,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc. v. M & M Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Senior v. HopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Seaboard Burner Corporation v. DeLongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Dipiro v. ChapinConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- Patterson Ex Rel. Patterson v. Her Majesty Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Rana v. Ritacco, No. 097257 (May 22, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995