Legal Opinion

Hieber v. Watt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 7, 1969No. 44011Published

1Opinion of the Court

119 Ga. App. 5 (1969)

165 S.E.2d 899

HIEBER, by Next Friend

v.

WATT et al.

44011.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Argued October 7, 1968.

Decided January 7, 1969.

Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Meade Burns, Reed & Tate, Berl T. Tate, for appellant.

Eugene G. Partain, Jack M. McLaughlin, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, for appellees.

EBERHARDT, Judge.

1. We find no error in the overruling of the general grounds of the motion for new trial. The duty of the operator of an automobile, relative to persons and property on the highway, is invariably that of exercising ordinary care, "such care…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Davis v. WhitcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Huckabee v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Savannah Electric Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API