Hieber v. Watt
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
119 Ga. App. 5 (1969)
165 S.E.2d 899
HIEBER, by Next Friend
v.
WATT et al.
44011.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Argued October 7, 1968.
Decided January 7, 1969.
Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Meade Burns, Reed & Tate, Berl T. Tate, for appellant.
Eugene G. Partain, Jack M. McLaughlin, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, for appellees.
EBERHARDT, Judge.
1. We find no error in the overruling of the general grounds of the motion for new trial. The duty of the operator of an automobile, relative to persons and property on the highway, is invariably that of exercising ordinary care, "such care…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Davis v. WhitcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Huckabee v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Savannah Electric Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.