Legal Opinion

Shea v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 31, 2001No. AC 20633PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*625 Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

In this action for vexatious litigation, the plaintiff Stephanie W. Shea1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendant, Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (Chase). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that (1) the trial court improperly failed to apply the doctrine of collateral estoppel with respect to the prior litigation between the parties, thereby requiring years of relitigation of the issues, (2) the judicial findings from the prior proceeding that did not go to probable cause were sufficiently firm to bar their relitigation, (3) relitigation of probable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. SheaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Verspyck v. FrancoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Kaltman-Glasel v. DooleyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
  3. Verspyck v. FrancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Rieffel v. Johnston-FooteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. Evans v. Testa Development Associates, No. Cv 01-0806425 (Sep. 26, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API