Truman v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Crestón Superior Coivrt. — Hon. S. R. Davis,, Judge. Action upon a promissory note. There was a trial’ to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the defendant Schmitz. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
I. The note in question is for the ■ sum of four thousand dollars. The following is a copy thereof:
*699“$4,000. Santa Anna, Cal., February 20, 1888.
i. pbomissoby notes: indorsementin wank: aence.-yerdence. States, I promise to pay to Carl Schmitz , r, . A ri tí . or order, at Santa Anna, California, the sum. of four thousand dollai’s ($4,000), with, interest from August 1, 1887, at the rate of .ten per cent, per annum, until paid. Interest payable annually, and, if not so paid as it becomes due, to be compounded, and bear the same rate of interest as the principal; and, in case default should be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. Harder & AverySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Campau v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Harrison v. McKimSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Delaware County Bank v. DuncombeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
3Cited by6 opinions
- Foedisch v. Chicago & North-Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Carbon v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Farmers Savings Bank v. WilkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Berry v. GrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Leach v. Plymouth County Savings Bank of Le MarsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.