Legal Opinion

Schnell v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 26, 1946No. (C. D. 1014)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States arising at the port of New York by protest against the collector’s assessment of duty under paragraph 770 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at 2% cents per pound on onions which are claimed to have arrived in a decayed condition, unfit for human consumption. The claim for allowance is based upon section 506 (1) of the said tariff act or on the ground that the merchandise constituted a nonimportation.

The record disclosed that 1,000 crates of onions marked “Frutera” and 963 crates marked “H. S.” were imported from Chile, arriving in New York on May…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lawder v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. Morris European & American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  5. Bush & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tapscott's H. A. Gogarty, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API