Legal Opinion
Banks v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 31, 2001No. 99-445 LPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs’ takings claims as time-barred. Plaintiffs are owners of property located along the eastern shore of Lake Michigan south of the harbor in St. Joseph, Michigan. Plaintiffs allege that the maintenance of the St. Joseph’s Harbor jetties by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), dating from 1950 until 1989, caused the erosion of their shoreline property. Seeking compensation for the lost property, plaintiffs filed takings actions in this court in 1999. Defendant contends that plaintiffs’ claims…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.