Legal Opinion

Ristine v. Hartford Insurance Co. of Midwest

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 2004No. 0204-03158; A120828PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

This is an insurance coverage case in which the issue is whether defendant Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest is obligated under its homeowners’ policy to cover a claim against its insureds for failing to prevent the insured husband from committing sexual abuse. Defendant contends that it has no such obligation because the policy expressly excludes from coverage bodily injury claims “arising out of sexual molestation.” The trial court agreed and entered summary judgment in favor of defendant. We affirm.

The material facts are not in dispute. Defendant issued a homeowners’ insurance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Worcester Mutual Insurance v. MarnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Northwest G.F. Mutual Insurance Co. v. NorgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. WarwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Osborn v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. James River Ins. Co. v. Medolac Labs.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
  3. Dueno v. Modern USA Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. California Northern Railroad v. Gunderson Rail Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  5. Pemco Mutual Insurance Company v. FoleyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API