Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1971No. 46045PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.(a) The indictment follows the statutory language of Code Ann. § 26-3001 (a) in charging that the defendants did "in a clandestine manner [conspire to] intentionally overhear, transmit and record and attempt to overhear, transmit and record the private conversation of one [Darracott] which originated . . . in a [stated] private place.” This is followed in the same count by a charge in the language of Code Ann. § 26-3001 (d) that the defendants "did intentionally and secretly intercept, by the use of a device, instrument and apparatus, to wit: a telephone, the contents of a message…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Poultryland Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Hardwick v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Montos v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  5. Fulford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hickox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Bean v. LandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Holland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Middleton v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API