Kendrick v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.(a) The indictment follows the statutory language of Code Ann. § 26-3001 (a) in charging that the defendants did "in a clandestine manner [conspire to] intentionally overhear, transmit and record and attempt to overhear, transmit and record the private conversation of one [Darracott] which originated . . . in a [stated] private place.” This is followed in the same count by a charge in the language of Code Ann. § 26-3001 (d) that the defendants "did intentionally and secretly intercept, by the use of a device, instrument and apparatus, to wit: a telephone, the contents of a message…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Poultryland Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Hardwick v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Montos v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Fulford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hickox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Bean v. LandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Holland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Middleton v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989