Legal Opinion
Poultryland Inc. v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 2, 1946No. 15398PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
While the bill of exceptions assigns error on the ruling on certain special demurrers, the objections are not argued in the brief of counsel for the' plaintiffs in error or insisted upon, and will, therefore, not be considered.
“A nuisance is anything that works hurt, inconvenience, or damage to' another; and the fact that the act done may otherwise be lawful shall not keep it from being a nuisance. The inconvenience complained of shall not be fanciful, or such as would affect only one of fastidious taste, but it shall be such as would affect an ordinary reasonable man.”…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Delta Air Corporation v. KerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Atlanta Coach Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Bacon v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Holman v. Athens Empire Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Coker v. BirgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Montos v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Spurlin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.