Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Hillsborough Mills

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 7, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

I. Any workman injured while in the employment of one who has accepted the workmen’s compensation act may elect to receive compensation thereunder or to bring an action at common law for negligence. By the terms of the statute an injured workman is barred from recovery in such an action by “accepting any compensation” under the act, by giving the prescribed notice or by “beginning proceedings therefor in any manner.” P. L., c. 178, s. 11. The pursuit of either the statutory or common-law remedy releases the employer from liability under the other. Gordon v. Company, 83 N. H. 221, 222. The…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ortega v. Salt Lake Wet Wash LaundryUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Nelson v. Westland Oil Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1949
  3. Johnson v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  4. Schofield v. E. R. Bates & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  5. Ferris v. SaulnierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API