Legal Opinion

Johnson v. National Biscuit Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 6, 1949No. 3858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The questions before us are, first, should the plaintiff’s action be dismissed on the ground that she has accepted payments of workmen’s compensation, second, if her action should not be dismissed should she as a condition of continuing her action be required to repay the defendant the amounts paid under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (R. L., c. 216) on the grounds that she became legally obligated to do so when she brought her common law action or that her counsel made a binding agreement at the hearing on September 14, 1948 that she would make repayment before continuing her common law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burtman v. ButmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  2. Roberts v. Hillsborough MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  3. Romano v. Littleton Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  4. Schofield v. E. R. Bates & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Westland Oil Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1949
  2. Hudon v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. Romero v. J. W. Jones Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Romero v. J. W. Jones Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API