Legal Opinion

Village of Whitefish Bay v. Hardtke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1968No. 148PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The only issue is whether there is sufficient credible evidence to sustain the verdict.

It is settled in forfeiture cases that the burden of proof is on the municipality to establish its case by a clear preponderance of the evidence or by clear, satisfactory and convincing evidence. Waukesha County v. Mueller (1967), 34 Wis. 2d 628, 150 N. W. 2d 364. If there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view fairly admits of an inference that supports the jury’s verdict, the verdict must be sustained on appeal. Weeden v. Beloit (1966), 29 Wis. 2d 662, 139 N. W. 2d 616.

The defendant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Weeden v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Fields v. CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Nieman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Abbott v. Truck Insurance Exchange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Consolidated Papers, Inc. v. Department of IndustryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Corning v. Dec Aviation Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API