Legal Opinion

Wenner v. McEldowney & Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 11, 1968PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

102 N.J. Super. 13 (1968)

245 A.2d 208

EDWIN FREDERICK WENNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

McELDOWNEY & COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 10, 1968.

Decided July 11, 1968.

Before Judges CONFORD, LABRECQUE and FULOP.

Mr. William G. Freeman argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant, Edwin Frederick Wenner (Messrs. Freeman & Freeman, attorneys).

Mr. Michael P. King argued the cause for defendant-respondent, McEldowney & Company (Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano, attorneys).

FULOP, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

This is an appeal from a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Johnson v. Salem Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Williams v. PageNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. Ehrgott v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  5. Ponzo v. PelleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API