Legal Opinion

Harbert v. Fort Smith Canning Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1931No. 30,104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*241The opinion of the court was delivered 'by

Smith, J.:

This was an action in replevin. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal.

Appellants were partners in the business of canning tomatoes at Green Forest, Ark. Fort Smith Canning Company, one of the appellees, is not a company, but a trade name for one Wampler. His business was that of selling tomatoes to jobbers and then buying them from canners in the Ozarks for delivery. Appellee, S. E. Lux, Jr., Mercantile Company, is a corporation engaged in the business of wholesale buying and selling of groceries- .and produce at different points in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People's State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. C. M. Henderson & Co. v. Gibbs & AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Kemper Grain Co. v. HarbourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Schulein v. HainerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Hamilton v. RankinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crouch v. MarrsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Laughlin Motors v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Publicker Commercial Alcohol Co. v. HargerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. Laughlin Motors v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API