Shelley v. Central Woodwork, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bubnett
The sole question for determination in this case is whether or not a posthumous illegitimate child is a dependent under the Tennessee "Workmen’s Compensation Law? The Chancellor answered this question in the negative, depending primarily upon our case of Sanders v. Fork Ridge Coal & Coke Co., 156 Tenn. 145, 299 S.W. 795. To this holding exceptions were duly taken and an appeal has been seasonably perfected, briefs filed and arguments heard. We now have the matter for disposition.
James Bice and Mary Shelley lived together in an illicit relationship and no common law marriage or marriage by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Great American Indemnity Company v. FriddellTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Green v. BurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Barker v. CurtisTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. DudleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
- Sanders v. Fork Ridge Coal & Coke Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- S. L. W. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Brown v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Birdsong Peanut Co. v. CowlingCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
- Texas Employers' Insurance Association and Burton Shipyard, Inc. v. R. J. SheaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Tune v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.