Legal Opinion
Daniel N. Mondrow v. Fountain House and Bernard I. Waters
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 15, 1989No. 88-1504PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
I
This appeal arises out of an action by plaintiff/appellant Daniel Mondrow, the purchaser of two units in a limited partnership for the purchase and operation of an apartment house, against Fountain House, the limited partnership, and Bernard Waters, a general partner, alleging that defendants violated various state and federal securities laws. Defendants have asserted a counterclaim on a note executed by Mon-drow.
At the close of Mondrow’s case, the district court granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict on all of Mondrow’s claims. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- The First Jersey National Bank, in No. 82-5620, in No. 82-5662 v. Dome Petroleum Limited and Dome Energy Limited, in No. 82-5620, in No. 82-5662Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Sharon De La Fuente and Murray De La Fuente, Her Husband, Individually and Doing Business as Tamara's Gardens v. Central Electric Cooperative, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Non-Punitive Segregation Inmates of Holmesburg Prison v. KellyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bensalem Township v. International Surplus Lines Insurance Company Crum & Forster Managers Corporation, (Ill)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- In Re Sharon Steel Corporation, Debtor. Atlantic Richfield Company v. Sharon Steel Corporation, the Honorable Alan N. Bloch, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Leibel v. City of BuckeyeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- United States v. WilkesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.