Commonwealth v. Tynnauer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 86, April T., 1907, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Butler Co., March T., 1906, No. 50, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Samuel Tynnauer. Indictment for selling liquor without a license. Before Galbreath, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict of guilty, upon which judgment of sentence was passed. ■ Error assigned was in submitting the case to the jury. Samuel Walker, for appellee.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
This case turned in the court below on the question whether the sales of liquors were made in Youngstown, Ohio, or in Butler county. The defendant, representing a firm of liquor dealers in Youngstown, took orders from various persons and forwarded them to his principals, by whom the liquor was sent by express O. O. D. to the purchasers. The orders were taken down by the defendant in his manifold orders book, but were not signed by the purchasers. The express charges were paid by the vendor. The purchasers did not give any direction as to the manner or place of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sneathen v. GrubbsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
- Braddock Glass Co. v. Irwin & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GuinzburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Commonwealth v. HecirrionicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Commonwealth v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Commonwealth v. RossiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910