Sneathen v. Grubbs
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the Court' of Common Pleas of Washington county: Of October and November Term 1878, No.- 141. Replevin by J. B. Sneathen and B. F. Wilson, partners, trading as J. B. Sneathen & Co., against J. W. Grubbs & Co..
Read the full summary
Error to the Court' of Common Pleas of Washington county: Of October and November Term 1878, No.- 141. Replevin by J. B. Sneathen and B. F. Wilson, partners, trading as J. B. Sneathen & Co., against J. W. Grubbs & Co.. The facts) in, substance, were these: In August 1875, the defendants made with plaintiffs the following agreement in writing; “Pittsburgh, August 10th 1875. “We have this day agreed to load for Sneathen & Wilson, and deliver in their landing at the Point, two (2) barges coal from our mines near Greenfield, Washington county, Pa., price to be four and one-quarter (4J) cents per…
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the' Supreme Court was entered November 25th 1878,
Per Curiam.-
Delivery of the coal'in these cases had not taken place, and all the terms of the contract of sale .had not been performed. No. title to the coal passed Which could • be enforced in replevin by.the purchasers. The remedy in breaeh of the-contract of sale was in a different áctioñ. ' " ' ■
Judgment affirmed in each case.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Dannemiller v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Belding-Hall Mfg. Co. v. Mercer & Ferdon Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Augustine v. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Star Brewing Company's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Braddock Glass Co. v. Irwin & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.