Commonwealth v. Rossi
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 31, Oct. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Huntingdon Co., Dec. T., 1909, No. 7, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Louis Rossi. Indictment for selling liquor without a license. Before Woods, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. At the trial the court charged in part as follows: There is no license granted to anyone to sell liquors in the borough of Mount Union.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 31, Oct. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Huntingdon Co., Dec. T., 1909, No. 7, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Louis Rossi. Indictment for selling liquor without a license. Before Woods, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. At the trial the court charged in part as follows: There is no license granted to anyone to sell liquors in the borough of Mount Union. This defendant, the evidence shows, resided .last summer and for the last year or two, in the borough of Mount Union. The commonwealth offers a number of witnesses. One…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
The substance of the testimony of Oliver Christ, a witness for the commonwealth, was that he ordered from the defendant, and at the same time paid him for the same, two kegs of beer, which it was agreed between them should be delivered to him on a certain day, at a certain place, and that the beer was delivered to him on the day named by another person named Tony Giasacobella. On cross-examination he testified that after he had paid for the beer he signed his name to a paper which the defendant presented but this paper is not set forth nor is its substance given in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HecirrionicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Commonwealth v. TynnauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Commonwealth v. PollakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. RossiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911